Water Infrastructure Finance And Innovation Progam Account and 1 other account
Schedules
TAFS: 068-0254 /X - Water Infrastructure Finance And Innovation Progam Account
| Previously Approved (Iteration 8) | Current OMB Action (Iteration 9) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Line # | Split | Description | Amount | Footnotes | Amount | Footnotes |
| 1000 | Unob Bal: Brought forward, Oct 1 | $255,703,072.00 | $255,703,072.00 | |||
| 1061 | Unob Bal: Antic recov of prior year unpd/pd obl | $5,000,000.00 | $5,000,000.00 | |||
| 1100 | BA: Disc: Appropriation | $64,634,000.00 | $64,634,000.00 | |||
| 1134 | BA: Disc: Appropriations precluded from obligation | See footnotes below | See footnotes below | |||
| Footnotes for line 1134 (Previous): | B2: Amount on line 1134 has been adjusted pursuant to OMB Bulletin 23-02 and A-11 section 120.41 | |||||
| Footnotes for line 1134 (Current): | B2: Amount on line 1134 has been adjusted pursuant to OMB Bulletin 23-02 and A-11 section 120.41 | |||||
| 1250 | BA: Mand: Anticipated appropriation | $555,613,393.00 | $555,613,393.00 | |||
| 1740 | BA: Disc: Spending auth:Antic colls, reimbs, other | $10,000,000.00 | See footnotes below | $10,000,000.00 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1740 (Previous): | B1: Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended. | |||||
| Footnotes for line 1740 (Current): | B1: Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended. | |||||
| 1920 | Total budgetary resources avail (disc. and mand.) | $890,950,465.00 | $890,950,465.00 | |||
| 6012 | Direct Loans (Credit Reform Subsidy) | $318,693,488.00 | $318,693,488.00 | |||
| 6013 | Administrative funding from fee collections | $15,000,000.00 | $15,000,000.00 | |||
| 6014 | Direct loan modification - San Mateo & Foster City | $1,643,584.00 | $1,643,584.00 | |||
| 6015 | WIFIA Upward Reestimate - Technical | $478,568,405.00 | $478,568,405.00 | |||
| 6016 | WIFIA Upward Reestimate - Interest | $77,044,988.00 | $77,044,988.00 | |||
| 6190 | Total budgetary resources available | $890,950,465.00 | $890,950,465.00 | |||
TAFS: 068-4372 /X - Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Direct Loan Financing
| Previously Approved (Iteration 15) | OMB Action (Iteration 16) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Line # | Split | Description | Amount | Footnotes | Amount | Footnotes |
| 1400 | BA: Mand: Borrowing authority | $3,000,000,000.00 | See footnotes below | $3,000,000,000.00 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1400 (Previous): | B3: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. B4: During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B5: During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25; $171,488,686 supports The Water Works Board of the CIty of Birmingham with a subsidy rate of 0.39 percent and a subsidy cost of $668,805.88; $14,805,000 supports Palmdale Water District with a subsidy rate of 3.79 percent with a subsidy cost of $561,109.50; $96,386,500.00 supports the Upper Thompson Sanitation District with a subsidy rate of 1.23 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,185,553.95; $42,630,000.00 supports Ogden City with a subsidy rate of 1.81 percent with a subsidy cost of $771,603.00; $188,290,418.00 supports Tohopekaliga One Water with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,543,981.43; $24,738,640.00 supports the City of Sandy with a subsidy rate of 0.45 percent with a subsidy cost of $111,323.88. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. | |||||
| Footnotes for line 1400 (Current): | B3: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. B4: During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B5: During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25; $171,488,686 supports The Water Works Board of the CIty of Birmingham with a subsidy rate of 0.39 percent and a subsidy cost of $668,805.88; $14,805,000 supports Palmdale Water District with a subsidy rate of 3.79 percent with a subsidy cost of $561,109.50; $96,386,500.00 supports the Upper Thompson Sanitation District with a subsidy rate of 1.23 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,185,553.95; $42,630,000.00 supports Ogden City with a subsidy rate of 1.81 percent with a subsidy cost of $771,603.00; $188,290,418.00 supports Tohopekaliga One Water with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,543,981.43; $24,738,640.00 supports the City of Sandy with a subsidy rate of 0.45 percent with a subsidy cost of $111,323.88. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. | |||||
| 1840 | BA: Mand: Spending auth:Antic colls, reimbs, other | $81,643,584.00 | See footnotes below | $81,643,584.00 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1840 (Previous): | B3: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. B4: During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B5: During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25; $171,488,686 supports The Water Works Board of the CIty of Birmingham with a subsidy rate of 0.39 percent and a subsidy cost of $668,805.88; $14,805,000 supports Palmdale Water District with a subsidy rate of 3.79 percent with a subsidy cost of $561,109.50; $96,386,500.00 supports the Upper Thompson Sanitation District with a subsidy rate of 1.23 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,185,553.95; $42,630,000.00 supports Ogden City with a subsidy rate of 1.81 percent with a subsidy cost of $771,603.00; $188,290,418.00 supports Tohopekaliga One Water with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,543,981.43; $24,738,640.00 supports the City of Sandy with a subsidy rate of 0.45 percent with a subsidy cost of $111,323.88. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B6: During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 as well as Foster City at a subsidy cost of $321,971; -$5,493,671 supports the modification adjustment transfer for San Mateo and -$1,501,826 supports the modification adjustment transfer for Foster City. | |||||
| Footnotes for line 1840 (Current): | B3: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. B4: During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B5: During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25; $171,488,686 supports The Water Works Board of the CIty of Birmingham with a subsidy rate of 0.39 percent and a subsidy cost of $668,805.88; $14,805,000 supports Palmdale Water District with a subsidy rate of 3.79 percent with a subsidy cost of $561,109.50; $96,386,500.00 supports the Upper Thompson Sanitation District with a subsidy rate of 1.23 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,185,553.95; $42,630,000.00 supports Ogden City with a subsidy rate of 1.81 percent with a subsidy cost of $771,603.00; $188,290,418.00 supports Tohopekaliga One Water with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,543,981.43; $24,738,640.00 supports the City of Sandy with a subsidy rate of 0.45 percent with a subsidy cost of $111,323.88. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B6: During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$5,493,671; Foster City was modified at a subsidy cost of $321,971 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$1,501,826; the City of LA was modified at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711 | |||||
| 1842 | BA: Mand: Spending auth: Antic cap tran, red debt | -$6,995,497.00 | See footnotes below | -$9,162,208.00 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1842 (Previous): | B6: During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 as well as Foster City at a subsidy cost of $321,971; -$5,493,671 supports the modification adjustment transfer for San Mateo and -$1,501,826 supports the modification adjustment transfer for Foster City. | |||||
| Footnotes for line 1842 (Current): | B6: During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$5,493,671; Foster City was modified at a subsidy cost of $321,971 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$1,501,826; the City of LA was modified at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711 | |||||
| 1920 | Total budgetary resources avail (disc. and mand.) | $3,074,648,087.00 | $3,072,481,376.00 | |||
| 6011 | Project: Future Direct Loans | $1,927,530,294.00 | See footnotes below | $1,925,205,400.00 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 6011 (Previous): | A1: All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. Rationale: Footnote specifies when the funds are available for obligation pursuant to legal authority. | |||||
| Footnotes for line 6011 (Current): | A1: All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. Rationale: Footnote specifies when the funds are available for obligation pursuant to legal authority. | |||||
| 6012 | Estimated Interest paid to Treasury | $60,000,000.00 | $60,000,000.00 | |||
| 6013 | Gun Lake Tribe | $55,975,447.00 | $55,975,447.00 | |||
| 6014 | Sarpy County | $45,315,483.00 | $45,315,483.00 | |||
| 6015 | Sharyland WSC | $17,992,000.00 | $17,992,000.00 | |||
| 6016 | Bloomington | $38,295,600.00 | $38,295,600.00 | |||
| 6017 | King County 3 | $194,125,628.00 | $194,125,628.00 | |||
| 6018 | New Lenox | $94,654,999.00 | $94,654,999.00 | |||
| 6019 | City of Memphis 2 | $10,275,781.00 | $10,275,781.00 | |||
| 6020 | Pajaro Valley Loan 1 | $43,109,270.00 | $43,109,270.00 | |||
| 6021 | Pajaro Valley Loan 2 | $31,099,063.00 | $31,099,063.00 | |||
| 6022 | WIFIA Downward Reestimate - Technical | $17,184,916.00 | $17,184,916.00 | |||
| 6023 | WIFIA Downward Reestimate - Interest | $750,362.00 | $750,362.00 | |||
| 6024 | The Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham | $171,488,686.00 | $171,488,686.00 | |||
| 6025 | Palmdale Water District | $14,805,000.00 | $14,805,000.00 | |||
| 6026 | Upper Thompson Sanitation District | $96,386,500.00 | $96,386,500.00 | |||
| 6027 | Ogden City | $42,630,000.00 | $42,630,000.00 | |||
| 6028 | Tohopekaliga One Water | $188,290,418.00 | $188,290,418.00 | |||
| 6029 | City of Sandy | $24,738,640.00 | $24,738,640.00 | |||
| 6030 | Modification - City of LA - negative subsidy account | Line added | $158,183.00 | |||
| 6190 | Total budgetary resources available | $3,074,648,087.00 | See footnotes below | $3,072,481,376.00 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 6190 (Previous): | A2: The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). Rationale: An agency spend plan or other documentation is necessary to better understand how the agency intends to obligate some or all of the apportioned funds. | |||||
| Footnotes for line 6190 (Current): | A2: The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). Rationale: An agency spend plan or other documentation is necessary to better understand how the agency intends to obligate some or all of the apportioned funds. | |||||
Footnotes
Footnotes provide further information about, or establish further legal requirements related to the use of, the funds in a given line or set of lines in an apportionment. If footnotes appear on lines 1920 or 6190, they apply to all the lines in the 1xxx and 6xxx sections, respectively. The following are all the footnotes associated with this file.
| Number | Text |
|---|---|
| A1 | All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. Rationale: Footnote specifies when the funds are available for obligation pursuant to legal authority. |
| A2 | The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). Rationale: An agency spend plan or other documentation is necessary to better understand how the agency intends to obligate some or all of the apportioned funds. |
| B1 | Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended. |
| B2 | Amount on line 1134 has been adjusted pursuant to OMB Bulletin 23-02 and A-11 section 120.41 |
| B3 | P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. |
| B4 | During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| B5 | During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25; $171,488,686 supports The Water Works Board of the CIty of Birmingham with a subsidy rate of 0.39 percent and a subsidy cost of $668,805.88; $14,805,000 supports Palmdale Water District with a subsidy rate of 3.79 percent with a subsidy cost of $561,109.50; $96,386,500.00 supports the Upper Thompson Sanitation District with a subsidy rate of 1.23 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,185,553.95; $42,630,000.00 supports Ogden City with a subsidy rate of 1.81 percent with a subsidy cost of $771,603.00; $188,290,418.00 supports Tohopekaliga One Water with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,543,981.43; $24,738,640.00 supports the City of Sandy with a subsidy rate of 0.45 percent with a subsidy cost of $111,323.88. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| B6 | During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$5,493,671; Foster City was modified at a subsidy cost of $321,971 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$1,501,826; the City of LA was modified at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711 |
The following are all of the footnotes associated with the previous iteration of this file. Note that previous iterations of accounts in this file may come from multiple previous files.
| File | Number | Text |
|---|---|---|
| 11346961 | A1 | All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. Rationale: Footnote specifies when the funds are available for obligation pursuant to legal authority. |
| 11346961 | A2 | The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). Rationale: An agency spend plan or other documentation is necessary to better understand how the agency intends to obligate some or all of the apportioned funds. |
| 11346961 | B1 | Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended. |
| 11346961 | B2 | Amount on line 1134 has been adjusted pursuant to OMB Bulletin 23-02 and A-11 section 120.41 |
| 11346961 | B3 | P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. |
| 11346961 | B4 | During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| 11346961 | B5 | During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| 11346961 | B6 | During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 as well as Foster City at a subsidy cost of $321,971; -$5,493,671 supports the modification adjustment transfer for San Mateo and -$1,501,826 supports the modification adjustment transfer for Foster City. |
| 11355334 | A1 | All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. Rationale: Footnote specifies when the funds are available for obligation pursuant to legal authority. |
| 11355334 | A2 | The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). Rationale: An agency spend plan or other documentation is necessary to better understand how the agency intends to obligate some or all of the apportioned funds. |
| 11355334 | B3 | P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $66,069,000,000 for FY2017-FY2023. |
| 11355334 | B4 | During FY 2023, EPA was authorized to obligate the resources for the following loans: $91,581,116.00 supports Santa Clara Valley Water Utility - Pacheco Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.62 percent and a subsidy cost of $567,802.92; $336,000,000.00 supports the City of Chicago with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent and a subsidy cost of $2,755,200.00; and $119,994,028 supports Fort Lauderdale with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $395,980.29.The actual obligations will occur in FY 2024. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| 11355334 | B5 | During FY 2024, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $55,975,447.00 supports the Gun Lake Tribe with a subsidy rate of 3.56 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,992,725.91; $45,315,483.00 supports Sarpy County with a subsidy rate of 0.25 percent and a subsidy cost of $113,288.71; $17,992,000 supports Sharyland WSC with a subsidy rate of 1.0 percent and a subsidy cost of $179,920.00; $38,295,600 supports Bloomington with a subsidy rate of 0.31 percent and a subsidy cost of $118,716.36; $194,125,628.00 supports King County 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.24 percent and a subsidy cost of $465,901.51; $94,654,999 supports New Lenox with a subsidy rate of 0.26 percent and a subsidy cost of $246,103.00; $10,275,781 supports the City of Memphis 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent and a subsidy cost of $32,882.50; $43,109,270.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 1 with a subsidy rate of 0.71 percent and a subsidy cost of $306,075.82; $31,099,063.00 supports Pajaro Valley Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.72 percent and a subsidy cost of $223,913.25; $171,488,686 supports The Water Works Board of the CIty of Birmingham with a subsidy rate of 0.39 percent and a subsidy cost of $668,805.88; $14,805,000 supports Palmdale Water District with a subsidy rate of 3.79 percent with a subsidy cost of $561,109.50; $96,386,500.00 supports the Upper Thompson Sanitation District with a subsidy rate of 1.23 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,185,553.95; $42,630,000.00 supports Ogden City with a subsidy rate of 1.81 percent with a subsidy cost of $771,603.00; $188,290,418.00 supports Tohopekaliga One Water with a subsidy rate of 0.82 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,543,981.43; $24,738,640.00 supports the City of Sandy with a subsidy rate of 0.45 percent with a subsidy cost of $111,323.88. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| 11355334 | B6 | During FY 2024, EPA modified San Mateo at a subsidy cost of $1,321,613 as well as Foster City at a subsidy cost of $321,971; -$5,493,671 supports the modification adjustment transfer for San Mateo and -$1,501,826 supports the modification adjustment transfer for Foster City. |
Notes about this page
- † Links to public laws are automatically generated and are not guaranteed to be accurate.