Water Infrastructure Finance And Innovation Progam Account and 1 other account
Schedules
TAFS: 068-0254 /X - Water Infrastructure Finance And Innovation Progam Account
| Line # | Split | Description | Iteration 6 Previously Approved Amount | Iteration 7 Current OMB Action Amount | Footnotes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 | Unob Bal: Brought forward, Oct 1 | $307,776,267 | $307,776,267 | ||
| 1061 | Unob Bal: Antic recov of prior year unpd/pd obl | $8,496,403 | $8,496,403 | ||
| 1100 | BA: Disc: Appropriation | $64,634,000 | $64,634,000 | ||
| 1250 | BA: Mand: Anticipated appropriation | Line added— | +$1,093,221,652 $1,093,221,652 | ||
| 1740 | BA: Disc: Spending auth:Antic colls, reimbs, other | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1740 (Previous): | B4: Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended." | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1740 (Current): | B4: Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended." | ||||
| 1920 | Total budgetary resources avail (disc. and mand.) | $390,906,670 | +$1,093,221,652 $1,484,128,322 | ||
| 6012 | Direct Loans (Credit Reform Subsidy) | $375,906,670 | $375,906,670 | ||
| 6013 | Administrative funding from fee collections | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | ||
| 6014 | WIFIA Upward Reestimate - Technical | Line added— | +$953,736,037 $953,736,037 | ||
| 6015 | WIFIA Upward Reestimate - Interest | Line added— | +$139,485,615 $139,485,615 | ||
| 6190 | Total budgetary resources available | $390,906,670 | +$1,093,221,652 $1,484,128,322 | ||
TAFS: 068-4372 /X - Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Direct Loan Financing
| Line # | Split | Description | Iteration 13 Previously Approved Amount | Iteration 14 Current OMB Action Amount | Footnotes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1200 | BA: Mand: Appropriation | $5,597,671 | $5,597,671 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1200 (Previous): | B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. B8: Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1200 (Current): | B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. | ||||
| 1236 | BA: Mand: Appropriations applied to repay debt | -$5,597,671 | -$5,597,671 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1236 (Previous): | B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. B8: Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1236 (Current): | B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. | ||||
| 1400 | BA: Mand: Borrowing authority | $3,000,000,000 | $3,000,000,000 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1400 (Previous): | B1: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. P.L.118-42 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2024. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2025. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $91,069,000,000 for FY 2017, FY 2018, FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY2025. B2: During FY2024, EPA was authorized to modify the City of Los Angeles at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711. The actual modification will occur in FY2025. B3: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $12,587,629 supports New Castle County with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent and a subsidy cost of $37,762.89; $156,528,628 supports Pflugerville 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.61 percent and a subsidy cost of $954,824.63; $196,000,000.00 supports Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.22 percent and a subsidy cost of $431,200.00; $318,990,000 supports Portland Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 1.42 percent and a subsidy cost of $4,529,658.00; $336,000,000.00 supports the re-obligation of Chicago Water that was originally approved in FY2023, with a subsidy rate of 0.49 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,646,400.00; $89,891,562.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $296,642.15; $147,301,350.00 supports Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.53 percent and a subsidy cost of $780,697.16; $110,000,000.00 supports Weber Basin Water Conservancy District with a subsidy rate of 0.41 percent and a subsidy cost of $451,000.00; $123,480,000 supports the City of Lake Oswego with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent with a subsidy cost of $370,440.00; $65,007,667.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $214,525.30; $73,279,503.00 supports Ashland with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent and a subsidy cost of $381,053.42; $86,926,000.00 supports Joliet 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.86 percent and a subsidy cost of $747,563.60; $147,245,000.00 supports the City of Medford with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $927,643.50; $176,302,949.00 supports Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,110,708.58; $184,727,654.00 supports the City of Baltimore - Wastewater with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,163,784.22; $28,106,964.00 supports Rockwood - Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent with a subsidy cost of $146,156.21. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B8: Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1400 (Current): | B1: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. P.L.118-42 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2024. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2025. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $91,069,000,000 for FY 2017, FY 2018, FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY2025. B2: During FY2024, EPA was authorized to modify the City of Los Angeles at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711. The actual modification will occur in FY2025. B3: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $12,587,629 supports New Castle County with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent and a subsidy cost of $37,762.89; $156,528,628 supports Pflugerville 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.61 percent and a subsidy cost of $954,824.63; $196,000,000.00 supports Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.22 percent and a subsidy cost of $431,200.00; $318,990,000 supports Portland Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 1.42 percent and a subsidy cost of $4,529,658.00; $336,000,000.00 supports the re-obligation of Chicago Water that was originally approved in FY2023, with a subsidy rate of 0.49 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,646,400.00; $89,891,562.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $296,642.15; $147,301,350.00 supports Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.53 percent and a subsidy cost of $780,697.16; $110,000,000.00 supports Weber Basin Water Conservancy District with a subsidy rate of 0.41 percent and a subsidy cost of $451,000.00; $123,480,000 supports the City of Lake Oswego with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent with a subsidy cost of $370,440.00; $65,007,667.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $214,525.30; $73,279,503.00 supports Ashland with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent and a subsidy cost of $381,053.42; $86,926,000.00 supports Joliet 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.86 percent and a subsidy cost of $747,563.60; $147,245,000.00 supports the City of Medford with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $927,643.50; $176,302,949.00 supports Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,110,708.58; $184,727,654.00 supports the City of Baltimore - Wastewater with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,163,784.22; $28,106,964.00 supports Rockwood - Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent with a subsidy cost of $146,156.21; $347,655,441.00 supports the City of Fort Worth with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,112,497.41. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. | ||||
| 1840 | BA: Mand: Spending auth:Antic colls, reimbs, other | $81,912,477 | $81,912,477 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1840 (Previous): | B1: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. P.L.118-42 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2024. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2025. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $91,069,000,000 for FY 2017, FY 2018, FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY2025. B2: During FY2024, EPA was authorized to modify the City of Los Angeles at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711. The actual modification will occur in FY2025. B3: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $12,587,629 supports New Castle County with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent and a subsidy cost of $37,762.89; $156,528,628 supports Pflugerville 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.61 percent and a subsidy cost of $954,824.63; $196,000,000.00 supports Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.22 percent and a subsidy cost of $431,200.00; $318,990,000 supports Portland Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 1.42 percent and a subsidy cost of $4,529,658.00; $336,000,000.00 supports the re-obligation of Chicago Water that was originally approved in FY2023, with a subsidy rate of 0.49 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,646,400.00; $89,891,562.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $296,642.15; $147,301,350.00 supports Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.53 percent and a subsidy cost of $780,697.16; $110,000,000.00 supports Weber Basin Water Conservancy District with a subsidy rate of 0.41 percent and a subsidy cost of $451,000.00; $123,480,000 supports the City of Lake Oswego with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent with a subsidy cost of $370,440.00; $65,007,667.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $214,525.30; $73,279,503.00 supports Ashland with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent and a subsidy cost of $381,053.42; $86,926,000.00 supports Joliet 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.86 percent and a subsidy cost of $747,563.60; $147,245,000.00 supports the City of Medford with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $927,643.50; $176,302,949.00 supports Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,110,708.58; $184,727,654.00 supports the City of Baltimore - Wastewater with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,163,784.22; $28,106,964.00 supports Rockwood - Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent with a subsidy cost of $146,156.21. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B6: During FY2025, EPA was authorized to modify Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. The actual modification will occur in FY2026. B8: Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1840 (Current): | B1: P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. P.L.118-42 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2024. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2025. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $91,069,000,000 for FY 2017, FY 2018, FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY2025. B2: During FY2024, EPA was authorized to modify the City of Los Angeles at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711. The actual modification will occur in FY2025. B3: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $12,587,629 supports New Castle County with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent and a subsidy cost of $37,762.89; $156,528,628 supports Pflugerville 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.61 percent and a subsidy cost of $954,824.63; $196,000,000.00 supports Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.22 percent and a subsidy cost of $431,200.00; $318,990,000 supports Portland Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 1.42 percent and a subsidy cost of $4,529,658.00; $336,000,000.00 supports the re-obligation of Chicago Water that was originally approved in FY2023, with a subsidy rate of 0.49 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,646,400.00; $89,891,562.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $296,642.15; $147,301,350.00 supports Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.53 percent and a subsidy cost of $780,697.16; $110,000,000.00 supports Weber Basin Water Conservancy District with a subsidy rate of 0.41 percent and a subsidy cost of $451,000.00; $123,480,000 supports the City of Lake Oswego with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent with a subsidy cost of $370,440.00; $65,007,667.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $214,525.30; $73,279,503.00 supports Ashland with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent and a subsidy cost of $381,053.42; $86,926,000.00 supports Joliet 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.86 percent and a subsidy cost of $747,563.60; $147,245,000.00 supports the City of Medford with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $927,643.50; $176,302,949.00 supports Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,110,708.58; $184,727,654.00 supports the City of Baltimore - Wastewater with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,163,784.22; $28,106,964.00 supports Rockwood - Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent with a subsidy cost of $146,156.21; $347,655,441.00 supports the City of Fort Worth with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,112,497.41. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B6: During FY2025, EPA was authorized to modify Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. The actual modification will occur in FY2026. | ||||
| 1842 | BA: Mand: Spending auth: Antic cap tran, red debt | -$1,042,602 | -$1,042,602 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1842 (Previous): | B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B6: During FY2025, EPA was authorized to modify Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. The actual modification will occur in FY2026. B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. B8: Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1842 (Current): | B5: During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. B6: During FY2025, EPA was authorized to modify Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. The actual modification will occur in FY2026. B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. | ||||
| 1920 | Total budgetary resources avail (disc. and mand.) | $3,080,869,875 | $3,080,869,875 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 1920 (Previous): | B7: Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 1920 (Current): | B8: Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. | ||||
| 6011 | Project: Future Direct Loans | $765,745,985 | -$594,401,513 $171,344,472 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 6011 (Previous): | A1: All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. | ||||
| Footnotes for line 6011 (Current): | A1: All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. | ||||
| 6012 | Estimated Interest paid to Treasury | $60,000,000 | $60,000,000 | ||
| 6013 | New Castle County | $12,587,629 | $12,587,629 | ||
| 6014 | Pflugerville 2 | $156,528,628 | $156,528,628 | ||
| 6015 | Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 | $196,000,000 | $196,000,000 | ||
| 6016 | Portland Loan 2 | $318,990,000 | $318,990,000 | ||
| 6017 | Santa Cruz modification - negative subsidy account | $2,279,102 | $2,279,102 | ||
| 6018 | Re-obligation of Chicago Water - Re-execution | $336,000,000 | $336,000,000 | ||
| 6019 | King County - Tranche 2 (King County 4) | $89,891,562 | $89,891,562 | ||
| 6020 | Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 | $147,301,350 | $147,301,350 | ||
| 6021 | Weber Basin Water Conservancy District | $110,000,000 | $110,000,000 | ||
| 6022 | Portland 1 modification - negative subsidy account | $469,882 | $469,882 | ||
| 6023 | Lake Oswego | $123,480,000 | $123,480,000 | ||
| 6024 | King County 3 - Tranche 3 | $65,007,667 | $65,007,667 | ||
| 6025 | Ashland | $73,279,503 | $73,279,503 | ||
| 6026 | Joliet 3 | $86,926,000 | $86,926,000 | ||
| 6027 | City of Medford | $147,245,000 | $147,245,000 | ||
| 6028 | Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 | $176,302,949 | $176,302,949 | ||
| 6029 | City of Baltimore - Wastewater | $184,727,654 | $184,727,654 | ||
| 6030 | Rockwood Loan 2 | $28,106,964 | $28,106,964 | ||
| 6031 | Fort Worth | Line added— | +$347,655,441 $347,655,441 | ||
| 6032 | WIFIA Downward Reestimate - Technical | Line added— | +$222,803,733 $222,803,733 | ||
| 6033 | WIFIA Downward Reestimate - Interest | Line added— | +$23,942,339 $23,942,339 | ||
| 6190 | Total budgetary resources available | $3,080,869,875 | $3,080,869,875 | See footnotes below | |
| Footnotes for line 6190 (Previous): | A2: The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). | ||||
| Footnotes for line 6190 (Current): | A2: The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). | ||||
Footnotes
Footnotes provide further information about, or establish further legal requirements related to the use of, the funds in a given line or set of lines in an apportionment. If footnotes appear on lines 1920 or 6190, they apply to all the lines in the 1xxx and 6xxx sections, respectively. The following are all the footnotes associated with this file.
| Number | Text |
|---|---|
| A1 | All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. |
| A2 | The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). |
| B1 | P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. P.L.118-42 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2024. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2025. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $91,069,000,000 for FY 2017, FY 2018, FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY2025. |
| B2 | During FY2024, EPA was authorized to modify the City of Los Angeles at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711. The actual modification will occur in FY2025. |
| B3 | During FY2025, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $12,587,629 supports New Castle County with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent and a subsidy cost of $37,762.89; $156,528,628 supports Pflugerville 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.61 percent and a subsidy cost of $954,824.63; $196,000,000.00 supports Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.22 percent and a subsidy cost of $431,200.00; $318,990,000 supports Portland Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 1.42 percent and a subsidy cost of $4,529,658.00; $336,000,000.00 supports the re-obligation of Chicago Water that was originally approved in FY2023, with a subsidy rate of 0.49 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,646,400.00; $89,891,562.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $296,642.15; $147,301,350.00 supports Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.53 percent and a subsidy cost of $780,697.16; $110,000,000.00 supports Weber Basin Water Conservancy District with a subsidy rate of 0.41 percent and a subsidy cost of $451,000.00; $123,480,000 supports the City of Lake Oswego with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent with a subsidy cost of $370,440.00; $65,007,667.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $214,525.30; $73,279,503.00 supports Ashland with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent and a subsidy cost of $381,053.42; $86,926,000.00 supports Joliet 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.86 percent and a subsidy cost of $747,563.60; $147,245,000.00 supports the City of Medford with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $927,643.50; $176,302,949.00 supports Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,110,708.58; $184,727,654.00 supports the City of Baltimore - Wastewater with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,163,784.22; $28,106,964.00 supports Rockwood - Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent with a subsidy cost of $146,156.21; $347,655,441.00 supports the City of Fort Worth with a subsidy rate of 0.32 percent with a subsidy cost of $1,112,497.41. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| B4 | Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended." |
| B5 | During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. |
| B6 | During FY2025, EPA was authorized to modify Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. The actual modification will occur in FY2026. |
| B7 | Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. |
| B8 | Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. |
The following are all of the footnotes associated with the previous iteration of this file. Note that previous iterations of accounts in this file may come from multiple previous files.
| File | Number | Text |
|---|---|---|
| 11435609 | A4 | Amount of anticipated indefinite appropriations derived from trust fund receipts on line 1150 are adjusted and apportioned to line 6011, 5 business days after EPA submits a spend plan for tax revenue available in FY 2025. |
| 11435609 | B4 | Pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 33 USC 3909, Section 5030, and 33 USC 3908, Section 5029, the Administrator of EPA may collect and spend fees at a level that is sufficient to cover: (a) the costs of services of expert firms; (b) all or a portion of the costs to the Federal Government of servicing the Federal credit instruments. P.L. 117-328 provides WIFIA authority to collect fees to be credited to the appropriation and remain available until expended." |
| 11435609 | B8 | In accordance with BDR 23-35, the funds made unavailable due to sequester in FY 2024, identified on line 1802 for account 68-4310 /X (Reregistration and Expedited Processing Revolving Fund) are expected to be made available in FY 2025 pursuant to Section 256(k)(6) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. |
| 11435609 | B9 | The amount on line 1823 for account 68-4310 /X (Reregistration and Expedited Processing Revolving Fund) reflects the sequester reduction of 5.7 percent required by the OMB Report to the Congress on the BBEDCA 251A Sequestration for Fiscal Year 2025 |
| 11435609 | B12 | In accordance with BDR 23-35, the funds made unavailable due to sequester in FY 2024 identified on line 1203 for account 68-8145 /X (Hazardous Substance Superfund) are expected to be made available in FY 2025 pursuant to Section 256(k)(6) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. |
| 11435609 | B13 | The amount on line 1232 for account 020-00-8145 (Hazardous Substance Superfund) is requiredby the OMB Report to the Congress on the BBEDCA 251A Sequestration for Fiscal Year 2025 assuming that the program requires appropriations equal to the amount listed on line 1251 02. Due to the indefinite nature of this account, the sequester amount in dollars may not be equal to the sequester amount in dollars reflected in the OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2025. During the remainder of the fiscal year, if the necessary appropriation is different from the amounts listed on line 1251 02, the amount of dollars currently reflected on line 1232 is hereby automatically apportioned as follows: The agency will achieve the reduction by applying a 5.7 percent reduction to obligations from the beginning of the fiscal year. |
| 11435609 | B14 | Public Law 117-58 (IIJA) provides future appropriations for TAFS: 68-0108 /X in Fiscal years 2023 -2026 as follows: FY2023-$386,800,000; FY2024 -$386,800,000; FY2025 -$386,800,000; FY2026-$386,800,000 |
| 11435609 | B15 | Public Law 117-58 (IIJA) provides future appropriations for TAFS: 68-0103 /X fin Fiscal years 2023 -FY2026 as follows: FY2023 -$10,819,000,000; FY2024 -$11,221,000,000; FY2025 -$11,621,000,000; FY2026-$11,621,000,000 |
| 11435609 | B16 | The amount on line 1150 for account (068-X-8145) represent the total of the FY 2024 quarter 1 certified Excise Tax recipts ($282,045,529.12), the FY 2024 quarter 2 certified Excise Tax Recipts ($421,230,456.04) and the FY 2024 quarter 3 certified Excise Tax Recipts ($358,712,134.62) and the FY 2024 quarter 4 certified Excise Tax Recipts ($400,268,661.01) |
| 11435609 | B17 | Represents the Superfund Trust Fund Balance on September 30, 2024 |
| 11435609 | B18 | Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. |
| 11443967 | A1 | All funding amounts provided for obligation to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for direct loans administered under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program are apportioned for the fiscal year, and available for obligation under Category B at such time as the subsidy costs for each project are determined in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), as amended. |
| 11443967 | A2 | The listed subsidy rates, subsidy amounts and loan amounts are notional. The final subsidy rates and subsidy amounts are subject to OMB revision based upon receipt of the final rating opinion letters prior to final acceptance and financing of the WIFIA loans per 33 U.S.C § 3907(a)(1)(D)(ii). |
| 11443967 | B1 | P.L. 114-254, Section 197(a) provided a loan limit of $2,073,000,000. P.L 115-31 added $976,000,000, for a total loan limit of $3,049,000,000 for FY 2017. P.L. 115-141 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 430 (4) (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,100,000,000, for a total loan limit of $6,710,000,000 for FY 2018. P.L. 116-6 provided a loan limit of $610,000,000, and Section 429 (c) of that same bill provided an additional $6,700,000,000, for a total loan limit of $7,310,000,000 for FY 2019. P.L. 116-94 provided a loan limit of $11,500,000,000 for FY 2020. P.L.116-260 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2021. P.L.117-103 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2022. P.L. 117-328 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2023. P.L.118-42 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2024. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 provided a loan limit of $12,500,000,000 for FY 2025. The cumulative loan limit for WIFIA is $91,069,000,000 for FY 2017, FY 2018, FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, FY 2023, FY 2024, and FY2025. |
| 11443967 | B2 | During FY2024, EPA was authorized to modify the City of Los Angeles at a subsidy cost of -$158,183 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$2,166,711. The actual modification will occur in FY2025. |
| 11443967 | B3 | During FY2025, EPA is authorized to use these resources for the following loans: $12,587,629 supports New Castle County with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent and a subsidy cost of $37,762.89; $156,528,628 supports Pflugerville 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.61 percent and a subsidy cost of $954,824.63; $196,000,000.00 supports Indiana Finance Authority Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.22 percent and a subsidy cost of $431,200.00; $318,990,000 supports Portland Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 1.42 percent and a subsidy cost of $4,529,658.00; $336,000,000.00 supports the re-obligation of Chicago Water that was originally approved in FY2023, with a subsidy rate of 0.49 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,646,400.00; $89,891,562.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $296,642.15; $147,301,350.00 supports Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.53 percent and a subsidy cost of $780,697.16; $110,000,000.00 supports Weber Basin Water Conservancy District with a subsidy rate of 0.41 percent and a subsidy cost of $451,000.00; $123,480,000 supports the City of Lake Oswego with a subsidy rate of 0.30 percent with a subsidy cost of $370,440.00; $65,007,667.00 supports King County 3 - Tranche 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.33 percent and a subsidy cost of $214,525.30; $73,279,503.00 supports Ashland with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent and a subsidy cost of $381,053.42; $86,926,000.00 supports Joliet 3 with a subsidy rate of 0.86 percent and a subsidy cost of $747,563.60; $147,245,000.00 supports the City of Medford with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $927,643.50; $176,302,949.00 supports Pflugerville 2 - Tranche 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,110,708.58; $184,727,654.00 supports the City of Baltimore - Wastewater with a subsidy rate of 0.63 percent and a subsidy cost of $1,163,784.22; $28,106,964.00 supports Rockwood - Loan 2 with a subsidy rate of 0.52 percent with a subsidy cost of $146,156.21. No changes are required on the program account for these loan transactions, only entries on the direct loan financing account. |
| 11443967 | B5 | During FY2025, EPA is authorized to modify the Santa Cruz at a subsidy cost of -$2,279,101.72 with the modification adjustment transfer of $4,979,090.71; Portland 1 at a subsidy cost of -$469,881.51 with the modification adjustment transfer of $618,580.11; Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with the modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. |
| 11443967 | B6 | During FY2025, EPA was authorized to modify Joliet 1 with a subsidy cost of $1,234,579.67 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$661,516.61; Joliet 2 with a subsidy cost of $677,896.69 with a modification adjustment transfer of -$381,085.37. The actual modification will occur in FY2026. |
| 11443967 | B7 | Pursuant to the Federal Credit Reform Act (FCRA), title V of Public Law 93-344, as amended, which provides the budget authority for the modification adjustment transfer. |
| 11443967 | B8 | Pursuant to section 120.21 of OMB Circular A-11, one or more lines in the Budgetary Resources section may be rounded up. As a result, those rounded lines will not match the actuals reported on the SF133. Agency will Ensure that its funds control system will only allot actuals. |
Notes about this page
- † Links to public laws are automatically generated and are not guaranteed to be accurate.